[WEB1901] Que choisir et spams

[Gilles Beauregard]

Allo!

At 09:23 2003-04-22, you wrote:

>Avez vous vu passer le ci dessous

Oui!

>Benoît Granger
>
>
> Center for democracy and technology, organisme américain dont
>l'activité est proche de celle de la Commission nationale informatique

Pour ceux qui voudrait lire le rapport complet:

http://www.cdt.org/speech/spam/030319spamreport.pdf

De mon coté, je l'ai lu, et voici quelques remarques:

>I just read your report on spam, and it's look great. If I 
>have to rate it, I give you a 80% on my rate scale. One of 
>the lack on the report, is fact that you ignore the major 
>source of spam for PROFESSIONAL spammers. The complaint 
>made to him to have your email address remove from their 
>list or complaint made to their provider who share the 
>email with others spammers. 
> 
>Also, the disposable e-mail address is a bad behavior, 
>when you talk about spam. In place, you must use an 
>auto-responder on your public email address. The 
>disposable e-mail is only a big waste of ressource, 
>giving the wrong message. "The email address have no 
>value, and can be drop at anytime". For the majority, 
>the email is a valuable acess and must/will be use for 
>a long period. When, you drop an email address, it's 
>like have to reborn again. 

Au plaisir

Gilles B.

---
 Votre site est-il à l'abri des SPAMMERS?
 http://www.curce.org/spam_challenge/

   CURCE 
 Collectif pour un Usage 
 Responsable du Courier Électronique
 http://www.curce.org/m/gilles/